Csspecs

Previous | Showing reviews 61-70 of 91 | Next

1. Well Engineered and Built

   Posted by Jbaggie88 on 7th Jan 2017

   Both of the 10 round magazines fit and fed perfectly. Excellent product and well worth the investment.

   ---

2. VEPR 54r 10rnd Magazine

   Posted by Dan P on 7th Jan 2017

   I purchased two 10 round magazine's for the same rifle. One mag fit perfect. The other magazine needed some filing in a couple of spots which was no big deal. Off to the range I went to test out the magazines. Both magazines functioned good with no problems.

   ---

3. Very good mags

   Posted by DM on 7th Jan 2017

   Bought two on faith. Work really well in my 20.5" right out of the very well protected packaging. Cycled through all 10 rounds with no hangups. Would recommend due to the great construction and good functionality of these magazines.

   ---

4. Not an owner but very impressed

   Posted by Joe on 2nd Jan 2017

   I haven't purchased this mag yet. i don't buy things until bugs have been?worked out. I'm very impressed that CCSPECS has taken this project on because all of my DIY nags have not worked entirely. i happy that CSSPECS have followed through with issues that have risen in different bolts not running the mags, 2 thumbs way up. I've been sketching out a possible way to double stack this cartridge and feed like single stack but I'm no engineer but neither was Mikhail Kalashnikov R.I.P. can't wait to see other innovations by CSSPECS.
   
   ps: one experimental mag i did was cutting the top of a mosin archangel mag and polymer soldering it to bottom of original Russian 54r mag with decent results but spring force wasn't enough for reliable feed for 17rnds.

   ---

5. GET SOME!!

   Posted by Royceshooter on 31st Dec 2016

   These mags are badass, finally quality metal 10rd mags. All three fit my rifle snugly without any required fitting. They are built like Russian Tank, like VEPR!! But in the good ole U.S. of A. Hell yeah. They look really cool too, I can't stop looking at my rifle with one of these inserted. It'd be really badass if they decided to make 15 or 20 rounders or some 6.5 Grendel VEPR mags!! Please??

   ---

6. Great magazines.

   Posted by Maksim T. on 30th Dec 2016

   I have been waiting and hoping for quality magazines for awhile. I have been saying that only thing that keeps this rifle from flying of the shelves is great magazine. SGM Tactical couldn't provide that quality, even they did work to certain degree. They were no more then stopgap until CSSPECS magazines. I am appreciated of CSSPECS to taking risk and making the magazine, I understand risks they have to take and investment they had to involve. I hope they make Vepr 3006 magazines now, hint.

   ---

7. par for the course.

   Posted by Reliant Anesth., Texas. on 29th Dec 2016

   My mags shipped very fast. They were very professionally packed. I was afforded the opportunity to test these before final production so the end product quality was already anticipated. The finish, fit and function have been 100% and by far exceeds the OEM factory mags. This SHOULD HAVE been the mag the factory produced. They would be envious. Thank you for providing these to us that needed them.
   Bravo!
   

   ---

8. VEPR 54Reliable

   Posted by Matthew C. on 27th Dec 2016

   This magazine fit and worked as it should, originally packed in anticorrosive paper and shipped extremely fast. Snapped into magazine well perfectly without any filing or adjustents to catch, 10 rounds loaded, fed all 10 flawlessly, thank you Csspecs for producing such a quality magazine.

   ---

9. strong mag, looks good

   Posted by william on 27th Dec 2016

   best option for the vepr 54R.
   the mag functions great, and mine fit with no fitment needed.

   ---

10. Flawless cycling, but some magazines needed filing to fit different importers

    Posted by djshantec on 26th Dec 2016

    Overall awesome except for some slight fitment issues, they look great, built like the VEPR, the loader really works, this was my experience with different receiver importers and barrel lengths:
    - The 16" barrel length from WPA required the most filing on the rear mag catch, the tolerances were just too tight out of the box and would sometimes jam the magazine before it could lock in place. Once the mag was locked it properly, it fired flawlessly.
    - 20" TGI - same as 16", needed rear tang filed down to consistently clear the rear mag catch without getting stuck before it would lock in.
    - 23" WPA - fit without filing, pretty much spot on, no issues.
    -27" barrel length from WPA would most often lock in place but did jam up on the rear lip occasionally, nothing some filing can't fix.
    
    Having to custom fit the magazines for the barrel length and/or importer is a small price to pay for the reliability and durability these offer, just have to buy more!
    

    ---

Previous | Showing reviews 61-70 of 91 | Next